__________________________________________________________________

Vision
A Filipino society that upholds the dignity and nature of the human person with a special concern for improving the quality of life of the poor

Mission
Guided by the Catholic Social Teaching, we catalyze critical thinking, discussion and action principally through research, advocacy and capacity building to bring about morally informed choices and effective solutions to poverty.

The John J. Carroll Institute on Church and Social Issues is an organization and community of professional researchers and advocates committed to faith that does justice, working in solidarity with the Church and various sectors, responsive to the issues and concerns of the poor.

More recently, JJCICSI’s efforts have focused more strategically on capacitating local actors as an added dimension to the research and advocacy work for which the Institute is known. The program teams continue to undertake research-based policy advocacy but they have also ventured into developing projects that benefit the urban and rural poor, women and children, and local communities in environmentally vulnerable areas. At the same time they are engaged in mentoring, training, providing consulting services, and the production of manuals, templates and other tools to facilitate and make more effective the development of pro-poor projects on the ground.

This new strategy is born out of the analysis that in many cases, the failure to implement good laws and policies is due to weak institutions and/or a lack of capacity of those running these institutions. Moreover, with the decentralization of most basic services and governance responsibilities, local governments play a particularly crucial role in implementing social policies. Hence, one important thrust across the different programs has been capacitating local actors, particularly local governments, in the implementation of pro-poor programs.

At the same time, work with the organizations of the poor has continued, likewise focusing more strongly on capacity building. The usual research and advocacy have been complemented with a more deliberate effort at enabling these groups to participate effectively in governance processes, as well as in the implementation of policies and projects. The Institute’s expertise in social research and Catholic Social Teaching is put to use in the critical study of implementation and institutional issues, in addition to policy issues. This subtle but important shift is also in keeping with the kind of support increasingly being needed and requested by the Institute’s various coalition partners which involves policy implementation in addition to policy advocacy.

Priority areas of work for each program are:

Church and Family Life – Population and Development, Juvenile Justice, Health and Education Programs

Environmental Economics and Policy – Clean Development Mechanism (CDM)

Rural Development – Agriculture Microfinance, Agrarian Reform, Sugar Farmers/Workers in Negros, Mining and Social Entrepreneurship

Urban Poverty and Governance – City-Wide Poverty Profiling and Shelter Planning, Resettlement Policy, Alternative Tenure Arrangements and Housing Finance

__________________________________________________________________

In 1983, Senator Benigno Aquino was assassinated. This single event threatened to tear the nation apart. Observers noted that the country was then ripe for civil war. Indeed, there seemed to be no option available especially to the so-called middle forces, which included the Church. Rather, there were the discredited militarist government, on the one hand, and the resurgent Left, on the other, whose designs for a revolution appeared more and more attractive at that time. An alternative to both extremes could not obtain simply because the press and the academe had long been suppressed by the Marcos regime. There was clearly then a need for people and even institutions which would think through the already desperate situation and offer options – options that would take the country away from the brink of a violent collapse.

It was in response to this critical need that in 1984, the Philippine Province of the Society of Jesus established the Institute on Church and Social Issues (ICSI). Its mandate was clear – to be a think-tank, a center for deep reflection and analysis. Its main instruments were twofold – the discipline of the social sciences and the rich tradition of Catholic Social Thought. It was also to be led by no less than Father John J. Carroll, S.J., who was returning then from his post as Dean of Sociology at the Gregorian University in Rome. He would be assisted by Bishop Francisco Claver, S.J., champion of the basic ecclesial communities (BEC) in Mindanao, and a few other talented Jesuits and lay collaborators. The team buckled down to work right away, organizing discussions or fora and publishing materials on the controversial topics of the day. And thus, above the din of empty government rhetoric, on the one hand, and revolutionary propaganda, on the other, a new voice emerged especially for the middle forces. It was a voice of reason coming from deep reflection and analysis; a voice of hope originating from the rich resources of the Christian faith. ICSI was an instant hit among the Jesuit and Ateneo circles, the social development organizations which would later be known as NGOs or non-government organizations, as well as, Church organizations, including the leadership of the Church. Through its research and analysis, ICSI would like to believe that it contributed, in a small way or big time, to the eventual triumph of the peaceful alternative that was the people's EDSA revolution on the fateful days of February 1986.

The Transition to Democracy Although the whole country was in a great celebratory mood over the success of the People Power Revolution and the peaceful installation of a new government, many sectors, including ICSI, felt that the harder and more challenging work was only beginning -- the building up of democratic institutions. The tasks involved ranged from the framing of a Constitution, to the establishment of governmental structures truly representative of the interests of the people, particularly the marginalized. It was in the concerns of these sectors, in fact, that ICSI would specialize. For instance, its scholarship was fully employed in the campaign for agrarian reform that farmers groups and their support NGOs initiated. An agrarian reform law, albeit weaker than what the farmers wanted, would be passed under the Aquino government and ICSI’s part in the passage of the said law had been significant.

Soon after its involvement in the agrarian reform issue, ICSI took up the cudgels for the urban poor. Again, its scholarship was put to good use in the drafting of proposals on urban land reform, which would culminate in the passage of the Urban Development and Housing Act of 1992 (UDHA). Indeed, more than its participation in the agrarian reform issue, ICSI would be known for the passage of this social legislation. Certainly, it played a major role in consolidating the urban poor communities in Metro Manila into an alliance, the Urban Land Reform Task Force, drawing up the policy agenda with and for them, drafting the law, and then lobbying for its passage. With the successful passage of the law, ICSI realized its strength not only in research and writing, but in advocacy work as well. Significantly, at this time, the reach of the research work of ICSI went beyond the academe, government, and its partner NGOs or POs. Aside from the usual research monographs entitled PULSO and its monthly newsletter INTERSECT, ICSI started writing for the dailies, making its cause and work available or accessible to the wider public.

From Politics to Economics, From Global to National From politics and ideology, national concern shifted to economics during the Ramos administration (1992-1998). The President’s personal ambition was to make the Philippines a tiger economy like its neighbor countries in Asia. One would think that because of this priority, socio-economic measures would have no place in the Ramos administration. But in many areas or issues, the President proved to be a worthy ally of the social development sector. Together with other NGOs and POs, for example, ICSI was able to further the gains achieved in the issue of urban poverty. Through more rounds of lobbying and advocacy work, PD772, which during Marcos’s time criminalized squatting, was finally abrogated. Nonetheless, the economic agenda became part of or influenced ICSI’s work as well. Its work with the urban poor also included, for instance, the promotion of the Community Mortgage Program as a viable financial scheme for land and housing ownership and lobbying for the Comprehensive and Integrated Shelter Finance Act which became law in 1995. ICSI also delved into the vast fields of labor economics and found itself leading the research and advocacy on the informal sector, more commonly known as the “underground economy.” As regards the hotly contested agrarian reform issue, ICSI did not only champion land distribution, but also the necessity of agrarian support programs.

On the global scene around this time, democracy’s reach was expanding on the heels of the collapse of the Union of Soviet Socialists’ Republic. As a result of this democratic impulse, new advocacies would open up for the social development field which necessarily impacted on the work of ICSI. Advocacies such as women, children, and the environment became global concerns. World summits were staged and world declarations and agreements forged. Finding itself in the midst of these new exciting advocacies, ICSI set up research desks for these sectors and issues.

Organizationally, ICSI, like many other NGOs today, became more professionalized. The staff grew in number and expertise, attracting graduates from the Ateneo de Manila University. Certainly, for ICSI, organizationally and apostolically, this was a period of growth.

Consolidation The succeeding years from the time of the Ramos administration were challenging not only for the country but for ICSI as well. Another EDSA revolt ousted the short-lived Estrada administration and its successor government, the GMA administration, was mired in and rendered inutile by controversy after controversy. Civil society’s gains from previous years were slowly eroded. So ICSI continued pressing on the same advocacies especially the urban poverty agenda. But three factors at this time would impact on the work of ICSI, compelling it to prioritize its work and consolidate her internal resources. First, all around the globe, financing for social development work was waning. ICSI had to choose sustainable projects – those with funding or those that could fund themselves. Second, the times called for specialization and expertise. ICSI therefore had to stick to issues which were obviously its specialties by virtue of its long experience on the said issues and the staff’s academic backgrounds. Finally, impact—real and concrete—became the byword at this time; thus, ICSI had to go down to the local government units where it could create more measurable impact of its work and could monitor the impact of its work, e.g., in the area of urban poverty.

Yes, 25 years have gone by since ICSI’s founding, 25 years of truly fruitful work for the Church and the Filipino nation. And yet the future continues to beckon ahead for the newly named John J. Carroll Institute on Church and Social Issues.

By Fr. Emmanuel L. Alfonso, SJ

__________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________